Skip to main content

Faculty on Twitter

I chose to try to investigate university faculty engagement on twitter. I had trouble embedding the figure but the link is below. In my field in the classroom, I have never been asked to keep a blog or really interact with faculty online aside from canvas discussions. The survey conducted by Pearson in 2013 found that 55% of faculty felt that engaging students online through interactive technologies created a better learning environment. I believe this but also think we need to do more to incorporate STEM fields in this online environment. I feel that my engineering education has been primarily stuck in an 1800s rut of straight lecture and exam with occasional homework. I haven't heard of very good websites that help students solve complicated problems together but in my experience, working together is where you learn, but I realize that isn't true for everyone.

My experience in grad school is almost a complete 180 from my undergrad. I think this is due to the nature of grad school and the involvement of faculty in student's life. I have been thoroughly impressed with how faculty engage with students on twitter at conferences and I think this is a really impactful way to continue conversations about research after the presentation is over. It also allows a level of camaraderie with an international field of experts. Often now I find out about publications on twitter as well as conference submission deadlines. I have also found that I need 2 twitters. I have a public as well as a private to try to separate my conference interactions and professional relationships from my musings that just don't need to be on my PI's newsfeed. I think that social media has the potential to connect faculty and students easily once they leave the classroom and tools like LinkedIn have allowed me to stay in touch with faculty in undergrad. I haven't seen as much involvement in the classroom itself but I am sure that will change as I feel its relatively inevitable.


Popular posts from this blog

Mission Statements

I chose to look at and compare the mission statements of 3 colleges/ universities close to my family; Michigan State University (MSU), Addis Ababa Institute of Technology (AAiT) and Macalester College. I was interested in how the mission of a small liberal arts college like Macalester would compare with two much larger universities and how an international setting would alter the stated mission.

All three missions are quoted below with links to finding them. Examining each mission statement I was struck by how the different emphases related back to the school's identity. AAIT emphasizes the importance of "technology transfer" which I think is vital to helping educate the public of Ethiopia. MSU, as a contrast, emphasizes research and improving quality of life around the world and Macalester, as an internationally oriented small liberal arts school, really reflects this in their stated mission. I am interested in the contrasting lengths and vagueness that comes with establ…

Research Misconduct

As a PhD student and someone who's entire life is focused around research right now, I am often frustrated by the continuous analysis and iterating that comes from producing quality work. I know though that I want my work to mean something and that I need to do the due diligence whether it be in statistics, experiments, or quality assurance/ quality control and as frustrating as it is sometimes, I do enjoy it. I also continually try to remind myself that falsification, unethical research and practices hurt more than me if I were to engage in it. It hurts my professor, my family, my field and the societies relationship with science and research.

This week, looking at the Office of Research Integrity cases that come up I chose to focus on a recent case of Dr. Li Wang. She is being reported for "research misconduct by recklessly including false data" in grant applications. She did withdraw 3 of them and has been remorseful but still I wonder if her 'punishment''…

Open Access Journal

I'm all for open access to science but I do wonder - why do we have to pay 4,000 dollars for it to happen? I chose to look at Environmental Science and Technology, an American Chemical Society journal. The about the journal section is brief and states it's goals almost exclusively as a research journal with little/no attention to a broader audience or to generating discussion outside of the field. The journal, as an American Chemical Society subset, gives a 3 options for open access. 4,000 dollars for immediate open access or 2,000 for open access in 12 months. They is very little discussion about it and it feels like a topic there because it needs to be and not because the journal really wants it there.

I chose an industry standard journal as opposed to one known for its radically accepting open access policies because I see these as the real challenge. Getting the big 'standard' journals to acknowledge and see the advantages to open access to me is the real fight. Ev…
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.